The median sales price is a reasonable measure of property values in a market; however, (1) the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index is superior for tracking relative price change and market price direction, and (2) cost per-square-foot is superior for determining what was obtained for the money spent.
Irvine Home Address … 99 Alberti Aisle 320 Irvine, CA 92614
Resale Home Price …… $239,900
And the years rolled slowly past
And I found myself alone
Surrounded by strangers I thought were my friends
I found myself further and further from my home
And I guess I lost my way
There were oh so many roads
I was living to run and running to live
Never worried about paying or even how much I owed
Moving eight miles a minute for months at a time
Breaking all of the rules that would bend
I began to find myself searchin’
Searching for shelter again and again
Against the wind
A little something against the wind
I found myself seeking shelter
Against the wind
Against The Wind — Bob Seger
The median sales prices does not give any indication of what was obtained for the money spent. Median prices may be flat while people are either getting more for their money or settling for less. Also, the median sales price when charted over time occasionally gives false signals when prices appear to be moving on one direction when the prices of individual properties in the market are moving another. To deal with these problems with the median, alternate measures of pricing are used.
Cost Per-Square-Foot
Many data reporting services measure, record, and report the average
sales cost on a per-square-foot basis to address the problem of
evaluating what buyers are getting for their money. For instance, in a
declining market if people start buying much larger homes at the limit
of affordability, the generic median sales price would remain
unchanged, but since buyers are getting much larger homes for the same
money, the average cost per-square-foot would decline accordingly. This
makes the average cost per-square-foot a superior measure for capturing
qualitative changes in house prices; however, this method of
measurement does not capture the relative quality of the square footage
purchased, only the price paid for it. High quality finishes may
justify a higher price per square foot. There is no way to objectively
evaluate the impact finish quality has on home prices. The main
problems with using the average cost per-square-foot to measure price
is that it does not provide a number comparable to sales prices since
it has been divided by square feet, and it is not widely measured and
reported.
S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index
To address some of the weaknesses of the generic median sales price
as a measure of market value, Karl Case and Robert Shiller developed
the Case-Shiller indices for measuring market trends. This index
measures the change in price of repeat sales. It solves the dilemma of
pricing like-kind properties–almost. Although these indices capture the
price movements of individual properties far better than the generic
median sales price, it does not take into account value added through
renovation and improvement. To address this issue, the index gives less
weight to extreme price changes assuming the outlier is a significant
renovation. However, if there is a market-wide renovation of
properties, as was the case in many markets during the Great Housing
Bubble; this will cause a distortion in the index.
National S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, 1987-2007
The other weaknesses
of the Case Shiller indices concern how and where it is reported. Since
it is an index of relative price change rather than a direct measure of
price, the index is reported as an arbitrary number based on a baseline
date; therefore, the numbers are not useful for evaluating current
pricing. The index is also confined to 20 large metropolitan areas
around the United States. The large geographical coverage areas are
required to obtain enough repeat sales to construct a smooth index. The
broad yet limited geographical coverage fails to capture price changes
in smaller markets. Also, since the Case-Shiller index is a measure of
changes in prices of sales of the same home, it does not include any
newly constructed homes. No measure is perfect, but the Case-Shiller
index is the best at measuring historic movements in pricing because
its methodology is focused on repeat sales of the same property.
Los Angeles S&P/Case-Shiller Index, 1987-2007
{book}
The Great Housing Bubble was an asset bubble of unprecedented
proportions. Between 2000 and 2006, home prices increased 45%
nationally, and in California home prices increased 135%. [iv] Had this
amazing price increase coincided with a period of high inflation, it
may not have been indicative of a price bubble, merely the general
increase in prices of all goods and services; however, inflation was
low during this period. The inflation adjusted price increases
nationwide were 23% and in California it was 100%. There was no great
improvement in the quality of houses justifying the higher prices.
Although some homeowners made cosmetic improvements, the vast majority
of homes were unchanged during this period, and many deteriorated with
age. Resale homes did not undergo any form of manufacturing process
where value was added to the final product. There was little real
wealth created during the bubble, just a temporary exaggeration of
value.
Irvine Home Address … 99 Alberti Aisle 320 Irvine, CA 92614
Resale Home Price … $239,900
Income Requirement ……. $44,154
Downpayment Needed … $47,980
Home Purchase Price … $255,000
Home Purchase Date …. 10/29/2003
Net Gain (Loss) ………. $(29,494)
Percent Change ………. -5.9%
Annual Appreciation … -1.0%
Monthly Mortgage Payment … $1,030
Monthly Cash Outlays ………… $1,410
Monthly Cost of Ownership … $1,070
Redfin Property Details for 99 Alberti Aisle 320 Irvine, CA 92614
Beds 1
Baths 1 bath
Size 728 sq ft
($330 / sq ft)
Lot Size n/a
Year Built 1989
Days on Market 1
Listing Updated 10/8/2009
MLS Number P706322
Property Type Condominium, Residential
Community Westpark
Tract Ti
According to the listing agent, this listing is a bank owned (foreclosed) property.
Bright, one bedroom one bath, lower unit in great location. Kitchen has tile counters, wood/laminate cabinets and breakfast bar; spacious living room with window shutters; bedroom with walk-in closet; bathroom has tile flooring and fiberglass shower enclosure; washer/dryer connections located at front courtyard closet. Great for individual, new couple or investor. Close to schools and shopping centers.
Today’s featured property is a 2003 rollback. It was originally purchased with 100% financing on 10/29/2003. The owners later expanded their $51,000 second mortgage by opening a $271,200 HELOC and a $67,800 HELOC. Their total property debt was $543,000, and mortgage equity withdrawal was $339,000. The lender is actually losing about $350,000.