Major US Banks are distressed and closer to collapse than most realize.
Irvine Home Address … 3 RAINBOW Fls #53 Irvine, CA 92603
Resale Home Price …… $613,750
Look into my eyes
Now you're getting sleepy
Are you hypnotized
By secrets that you're keeping?
I know what you're keeping
I know what you're keeping
Got a secret
Can you keep it?
Swear this one you'll save
Better lock it, in your pocket
Taking this one to the grave
If I show you then I know you
Won't tell what I said
Cause two can keep a secret
If one of the m is dead…
The Pierces — Secret
The banks, the federal reserve and our government have been trying to conceal the true level of distress with our banking system. The policies being put forth in Washington only serve to extend this crisis and inhibit economic growth. First, let's take a look at how much REO the banks already have.
JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and BofA each hold more than $20 billion in foreclosures
by KERRY CURRY — Friday, October 22nd, 2010, 4:05 pm
JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo Bank and Bank of America each reported more than $20 billion in single-family mortgages currently foreclosed or in the process of foreclosure as of midyear, according to Weiss Ratings.
In addition, for each dollar these banks held of mortgages in ?foreclosure, they had additional exposure to more than $2 in mortgages that are 30 days or more past due.
"Although only some portion of the past-due loans will ultimately go into foreclosure, these figures tell us that the biggest players are not only in deep, but could sink even deeper into the mortgage mayhem," said Martin D. Weiss, chairman of Weiss Ratings.
As readers here know, part of the reason for the banks having so much REO is because Banks are being Forced to Repurchase Bad Bubble Loans.
Among all U.S. banks, JPMorgan Chase has the largest volume of mortgages in foreclosure or foreclosed with $21.7 billion. It has $43.4 billion in mortgages past due.
Bank of America has a somewhat smaller volume of foreclosures ($20.3 billion), but it has a larger pipeline of past-due mortgages — $54.6 billion. Thus, overall, including all foreclosed and delinquent categories, Bank of America has the largest volume of bad mortgages among U.S. banks, with $74.9 billion, while Wells Fargo has the second largest with $68.6 billion.
Other banks, despite their large size, are less heavily exposed. Citibank has $6.3 billion in foreclosures and $19.2 billion in past-due mortgages, or a total of $25.6 billion. The volume held by other large banks, such as U.S. Bank, PNC Bank, and SunTrust is smaller.
"In addition to the volume of bad mortgages, the vulnerability of each bank to the foreclosure crisis depends on the capital and loan-loss reserves it has set aside to cover losses and other factors such as its earnings, liquidity, reliance on less-stable deposits, and the quality of its overall loan portfolio," Weiss said.
Among banks with $1 billion or more of mortgages already foreclosed or in process of foreclosure, Wells Fargo has the greatest exposure to bad mortgages in proportion to its capital. For each dollar of Tier 1 capital, the bank has 75.4 cents in bad mortgages, or a ratio of 75.4%. The equivalent ratios for JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and SunTrust are 66.8%, 66% and 57.6%, respectively.
The issue of bank REO is critical to the housing market because How The Lending Cartel Disposes Their REO Will Determine the Market’s Fate. What's worse is that bank REOs are not the only problem as GSE Foreclosures Shatter Record Highs, Keep Climbing.
Also, for every home in REO, there are four that are delinquent on their mortgage and tied up in shadow inventory (Shadow Inventory Signals Three Years of Falling Prices).
Triple Down: Fannie, Freddie, and the Triumph of the Corporate State
October 27, 2010 — The Institutional Risk Analyst
"JOHN BULL can stand many things but he cannot stand two per cent." That aphorism, quoted by Walter Bagehot, a 19th-century editor of The Economist, expressed savers' traditional distaste for very low interest rates. For the first three centuries of the Bank of England's existence, 2% was indeed as low as the central bank was willing to let interest rates fall. Not even the Depression, nor the long Victorian period of stable prices, induced the bank to go any further. Some minimum return on capital was deemed to be required.
Buttonwood
The Economist
September 16, 2010
… Because President Barack Obama and the leaders of both political parties are unwilling to address the housing crisis and the wasting effects on the largest banks, there will be no growth and no net job creation in the U.S. for the next several years. And because the Obama White House is content to ignore the crisis facing millions of American homeowners, who are deep underwater and will eventually default on their loans, the efforts by the Fed to reflate the U.S. economy and particularly consumer spending will be futile. As Alan Meltzer noted to Tom Keene on Bloomberg Radio earlier this year: "This is not a monetary problem."
Government Props Weakened the Housing Market and Delayed the Recovery
Indeed, the public embrace by the Federal Open Market Committee of further quantitative easing or "QE", instead of calling for the immediate restructuring of the largest zombie banks, actually threatens to push the U.S. into a deeper and far more dangerous economic path. According to the Q2 2010 Bank Stress Index survey conducted by IRA and our review of the Q3 2010 earnings results, the financial condition of smaller lenders is actually improving. While the FDIC now has over 800 banks on its troubled list, the righteous banks for which we currently have "positive" outlooks in The IRA Advisory Service are showing better earnings and less credit stress.
Part of the reason for the improvement is that the FDIC and state regulators have taken a very hard line with smaller banks, pushing many into resolutions and distressed asset sales. But for the healthy lenders that survive and investors that buy failed banks, there will be a lot of money left on the table — profits that will come back into earnings via recoveries and other windfalls and help to boost the private economy. Resolution and liquidation is how a free market economy regenerates. The trouble is, the approach taken with the large banks and the GSEs is precisely the opposite of that applied to smaller lenders. The policy of the Fed and Treasury with respect to the large banks is state socialism write large, without even the pretense of a greater public good.
Forget Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner lying about the relatively small losses at American International Group (AIG), the fraud and obfuscation now underway in Washinton to protect the TBTF banks and GSEs totals into the trillions of dollars and rises to the level of treason. And the sad part is that all of the temporizing and excuses by the Fed and the White House will be for naught. The zombie banks and GSEs alike will muddle along until the operational cost of servicing bad loans engulfs them. Then they will be bailed out — again — or restructured. …
Living in a Post Bubble World: What's Next?
Pictures of Deflation
Comments by Christopher Whalen American Enterprise Institute October 6, 2010
Is the Subprime Crisis Over?
- No. The improvement in bank loan default rates is a mirage. The use of loan modification to make bad credits appear “current” is an economic fraud perpetrated by Washington that is already becoming apparent via foreclosure moratoria.
- Mounting cash flow stress on all lenders is reaching crisis levels. Non-payment by borrowers and mounting foreclosure backlogs are creating the conditions for the collapse of some of the largest U.S. banks in 2011.
Chart 1: Efficiency
- First stage of the banking crisis involved stress on liquidity due to market contagion. TARP, the Fed, FDIC responded with liquidity and debt guarantees.
- The second stage involved stress on capital via charge- offs and loan loss reserves, both of which drove banks into record levels of loss.
- The third stage of the banking crisis involves degradation of bank operating efficiency as restructuring accelerates, expenses rise and lenders involuntarily become non-operating REITs.
Lenders are becoming non-operating REITs. In the first story, we documented that the banks now own billions in non-performing real estate. At some point, banks no longer operate by making loans and collecting interest, they operate by buying property at foreclosure and collecting rent just like a REIT. When you buy bank stocks, are you really buying a disguised REIT? I think you are, except that REITs are generally well managed, and bank portfolios are not.
Chart 2: Net Interest Income
- Many on Wall Street believe that net interest margin or NIM among U.S. banks is at record levels. They are right, but not in the way that many investors and analysts expect.
- Unfortunately, measured in dollars, the NIM of the banking industry has been cut by a third over the past three years due to the Fed’s zero interest rate policy. Banks are literally dying from lack of yield on assets due to the Fed’s ZIRP.
The long-term problem with lowering interest rates to boost bank profits is that the yield curve flattens and the banks margins get squeezed. When banks could borrow at 0% and loan money for mortgages at 6%, the margins were helpful, and the banks had opportunity to recover; however, over time, competition drives down long term rates and flattens the yield curve. Banks are still borrowing at 0%, but now they can only loan at about 4.25%, a significant decline in margin.
Chart 3: Non-Interest Income
- In 2005-2007 period when the subprime frenzy peaked, non-interest revenue for U.S. banks reached a record $80 billion. Expenses, conversely, were muted as defaults disappeared, but are now growing rapidly.
- Since 2007, the non-interest revenue of all U.S. banks has fallen by over $10 billion. Non-interest expenses at U.S. banks will continue to increase due to residential and commercial foreclosures.
If bank portfolios weren't so poor operated, the non-interest income would be rising and non-performing loans would be converted to performing rentals.
For example, right now in Las Vegas, I can buy properties and obtain a 9% return based on rental cashflow, so I know the banks can too. If they began renting out their REO, they can obtain income superior to the loan interest they would obtain on a 4.25% note. In fact, I think they are rather foolish for not renting out more of their REO in beaten down markets like Las Vegas.
Chart 4: Exposure at Default (EAD)
- U.S. banks continue to shrink their unused credit lines to limit exposure to default. The shrinkage in EAD is also a function of slack demand for credit in a deflating economy.
- The combinations of still-record default rates and rising servicing costs related to foreclosures is making banks hyper-cautious about credit. The muddle along policy of Obama and Geithner = no net credit growth.
- Chart on the following page shows unused credit lines for BAC, C. JPM and the large-bank peer group created by The IRA Bank Monitor. Note all have greatly reduced EAD.
Conclusions
- The U.S. banking industry is entering a new period of crisis where operating costs are rising dramatically due to foreclosures and defaults. We are less than 1⁄4 of the way through the foreclosure process. Laurie Goodman of Amherst Securities predicts that 1 in 5 mortgages could go into foreclosure without radical action.
- Rising operating costs in banks will be more significant than in past recessions and could force the U.S. government to restructure some large lenders as expenses overwhelm revenue. BAC, JPM, GMAC foreclosure moratoriums only the start of the crisis that threatens the financial foundations of the entire U.S. political economy.
- The largest U.S. banks remain insolvent and must continue to shrink. Failure by the Obama Administration to restructure the largest banks during 2007-2009 period only means that this process is going to occur over next three to five years – whether we like it or not. The issue is recognizing existing losses — not if a loss occurred.
- Impending operational collapse of some of the largest U.S. banks will serve as the catalyst for re-creation of RFC-type liquidation vehicle(s) to handle the operational task of finally deflating the subprime bubble. End of the liquidation cycle of the deflating bubble will arrive in another four to five years.
I guess that means I will have plenty of properties to recycle over the next several years.
Live the Irvine HELOC abuse lifestyle
Let's be real honest about Californian's love affair with real estate: everyone here wants to spend the free money that comes out of the walls. People here believe house prices go up by magic, so all they have to do is buy and they get rich. Of course, if that believe is widely held, it is self-fulfilling — to a point. Trees cannot grow to the sky.
The owner of today's featured property regularly went to the housing ATM to spend the deposits left by the appreciation gods. in the process, he borrowed himself into oblivion, and now he is selling short after 14 years of loan ownership. He is probably pissed because no greater fool was willing to step forward and overpay for his run down property.
- This property was purchased on 5/3/1996 for $360,000. The owner used a $207,000 first mortgage and a $153,000 down payment.
- On 4/4/2002 he refinanced the first mortgage for $202,000. For the first six years of ownership, he had the mortgage going in the right direction.
- On 10/7/2003 he obtained a new first mortgage for $251,000. That $49,000 was his first taste of kool aid, and it changed his financial life.
- On 6/24/2005 he refinanced with a $338,000 first mortgage.
- On 4/25/2006 he got a $432,000 first mortgage.
- On 6/14/2007 he refinanced with an Option ARM for $595,000.
- Total mortgage equity withdrawal is $388,000 plus negative amortization.
- Total squatting time is about a year so far.
Foreclosure Record
Recording Date: 02/01/2010
Document Type: Notice of Default
Realistically, they will put off foreclosing on this guy as long as they can. The banks are praying prices will come back with sufficient volume to clear out guys like this. That isn't happening, and it isn't going to happen.
Irvine Home Address … 3 RAINBOW Fls #53 Irvine, CA 92603
Resale Home Price … $613,750
Home Purchase Price … $360,000
Home Purchase Date …. 5/3/1996
Net Gain (Loss) ………. $216,925
Percent Change ………. 60.3%
Annual Appreciation … 3.6%
Cost of Ownership
————————————————-
$613,750 ………. Asking Price
$122,750 ………. 20% Down Conventional
4.23% …………… Mortgage Interest Rate
$491,000 ………. 30-Year Mortgage
$116,181 ………. Income Requirement
$2,410 ………. Monthly Mortgage Payment
$532 ………. Property Tax
$0 ………. Special Taxes and Levies (Mello Roos)
$51 ………. Homeowners Insurance
$490 ………. Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$3,483 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays
-$396 ………. Tax Savings (% of Interest and Property Tax)
-$679 ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$186 ………. Lost Income to Down Payment (net of taxes)
$77 ………. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$2,671 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership
Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$6,138 ………. Furnishing and Move In @1%
$6,138 ………. Closing Costs @1%
$4,910 ………… Interest Points @1% of Loan
$122,750 ………. Down Payment
============================================
$139,935 ………. Total Cash Costs
$40,900 ………… Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$180,835 ………. Total Savings Needed
Property Details for 3 RAINBOW Fls #53 Irvine, CA 92603
——————————————————————————
Beds: 3
Baths: 2 full 1 part baths
Home size: 2,246 sq ft
($273 / sq ft)
Lot Size: n/a
Year Built: 1976
Days on Market: 96
Listing Updated: 40459
MLS Number: S625787
Property Type: Condominium, Residential
Community: Turtle Rock
Tract: Gh
——————————————————————————
Based on our analysis of the description, this listing may be a short sale or in a stage of pre-foreclosure.
Rare Below Market Opportunity in Prestigious Turtle Rock / Irvine This is a pre-approved short sale that can close quickly. The approval includes a significant credit repairs, new paint, flooring and fixtures. A great opportunity for the buyer looking for a home in the prestigious Turtle Rock community of Irvine. The home has 2,246 Sq Ft of living space, plenty of closet space and storage, crown molding throughout and need only misc. repairs, new paint, flooring and court yard landscaping. Make an offer now and select the paint colors, new flooring and fixture styles. Enjoy the walking paths, great schools and excellent location while buying a home with immediate equity.
The approval includes a significant credit repairs? I would think a short sale would include significant credit destruction….
I think that is a cut/paste error.
I wonder if there was a life change – getting married or something else. I’d also guess that there was a net pay-down of mortgage debt up to late 2000, as BRCM and other tech stocks ended their massive run.
I think Whalen is missing a point about current originations. Few of the large banks are holding onto the 4.25% mortgages they are originating. They are almost all going to the GSE’s. They are also reducing their exposure to performing 5-6% loans by refi’ing loans they (or another bank) own into GSE’s. I wonder if you had a 6% loan with Wells if they are calling you to refi? Before we moved, they were. They probably thought we’d be refi’ing with someone, so why not with them. I would expect this to have the effect of reducing bank assets/liabilities, but more severely impairing their cash-flow.
If we have a large bank failure it will not be Lehman-esque, or even AIG-esque, it will have to be closer to how Merrill or Wachovia went down. But if one of the massive 3 went down, you’d have to break it up in order for others to be able to swallow the pieces.
“When banks could borrow at 0% and loan money for mortgages at 6%, the margins were helpful, and the banks had opportunity to recover; however, over time, competition drives down long term rates and flattens the yield curve. Banks are still borrowing at 0%, but now they can only loan at about 4.25%, a significant decline in margin.”
I see you made some progress in understanding but you still don’t get it. The banks are borrowing at 0% and investing in t-bills and the margins are infinite no matter how you look at it. They are creating margin out of thin air. The banks sole goal is to stay in business so that they can continue to create margin out of thin air. Operating as an REIT is a side business that allows them to continue investing 0% money into t-bills.
That ain’t working, that’s the way you do it
Money for nothing and your G.S.E.
Exactly. Mortgages that are originated are sold to the government.
Obviously mortgage rates will continue to decline as long as this trade is available to the banks. The end game and goal should similarly be obvious: create inflation, that’s how banks stay in business. Anyone who couldn’t see this 2 years ago was blinded by their own self interest.
“Mortgages that are originated are sold to the government.”
No, they are insured by the government and sold to private investors in MBS pools. Banks are buyers of their own mortgage backed securities because they are as secure as treasury notes and have a higher yield. This is how the banks are recycling their bad loans and getting the government to take all the risk.
And with inflation, interest rates will go up — a lot…. And when interest rates go up, affordability will go down unless the inflation also translates to higher wages, which seems unlikely with high unemployment. Lower affordability and large supply makes for lower prices.
Anyone who couldn’t see this 2 years ago was blinded by their own self interest and kool aid intoxication.
9-28-2009 — The 2011 Inflation Spike — The Federal Reserve may allow inflation to spike in the medium term.
One day you will submit to the fact that you were wrong, but first you need to get rich in Las Vegas.
So let me get this straight, you can ‘invest’ in a MBS that’s insured (by the GSEs)? What does that mean, you have a secure investment with almost no chance of declining in value?
How can I get in on this action? I can’t find any stable investments yielding more than 1% right now. 1% is a far cry from keeping up with this inflation that someone is trying to create.
All you need to do is be born into the banking aristocracy. Maybe next life.
The GSE will insure you against default, but the investor still takes on the interest rate risk. Plus, unless you buy something like a mortgage backed REIT in your brokerage account (NLY for example), you will mostly likely need to have a serious sum of money to directly buy a MBS.
There’s not going to be high inflation any time soon. We had actual deflation last year, for instance.
All the junk that large banks sold to GSE’s and thought they washed their hands are now become bigger problem for banks again. FNM has already filed a suit againt BAC for putbacks, where BAC sold loans to GSE that were not qualified loans. In other words, banks issued FHA loans to folks who were not first time buyers, who did not meet FHA standards, and either/or got sour, GSE’s are sending these pools of loans back to the banks.
The problem in mortgage and banking is very severe, Govt. can and may continue to extend and pretend but day of recokning is coming. If job situation does not imporve which it sounds like its actually going to get worse, major problem is yet to hit markets.
Reality check PR… as a former banker, I can tell you that buying short term TBills yielding less than 0.25%, even if you are using money at 0%, is the death of a bank… that simply does not generate enough income and, more significantly, cash flow, as short term TBills are zero coupon bonds, meaning that the cash doesn’t come back with interest until the end of the term. So, if you are a bank, that yield doesn’t even keep the lights on… Sure, you can get a yield of about 4% on a 30 year bond, but no bank is going to take that interest rate risk… which is why they are selling their 4.25% mortgages to the GSE’s and pocketing the origination fees (non-interest income).
Don’t try responding to Planet Unreality with facts–you’ll be met with empty silence, or just a repetition of his usual mantras (high-end Irvine prices will never fall, inflation will save the banks, etc.).
As an add-on to PR’s comment. A LOT of REITs are also playing the margin game right now -> They leverage up 5-8x at near zero borrowing costs and hold onto MBS at 4% = 20% returns.
Also, you do not have to be born into the banking aristocracy (it helps a lot), but you do have to get into the game pretty much right out of college.
I had considered going down that path. The problem is that I was too short-sighted. I had many friends who took jobs with big banking/finance firms in NYC, and their salaries were around 1/3 of what the engineers were getting fresh out of college.
Fast forward ten years and even considering raises and promotions, the engineers have salaries 1/3 of what the banking/finance guys earn.
I know there’s a lot of attention about how the banks cut their staff, however most of the competent young guys are still around and have stable work.
the engineers have salaries 1/3 of what the banking/finance guys earn.
Obviously the engineers are not as brilliant as those finance guys!
When was the last time you saw an engineer run for office? I REST MY CASE.
The engineers are always weird, just like programmers, and don’t relate well to other people. They prefer watching Star Wars for the 100th time and planning their next ComiCon visit. They’re unfit for public speaking.
I think a lot of stereotyping went into your comment. Sure, engineers are not nearly as good at B.S. as attorneys but they most do relate well to other people, and are logical thinkers. I would bet many of the posters on this board have engineering backgrounds.
My reply was to “Perspective”.
Who saw the OC Register article today (too lazy to link) regarding UCLA school of econ predicting a 49% increase in home values in OC by 2016. You simply can’t make this stuff up!!!!!
I think they are already celebrating the passage of Prop 19 over at the Register. Lansner and his buddies are breaking in their new bong when they decided on those headlines. Too Funny.
I saw this in the USA Today the other day:
For many over 55, debt defers dreams
Basically talking about how high debt levels are affecting the Boomers. I read it looking for the house debt angle, but that was buried at the end. As always, it’s easier to talk about the victims (job loss and medical, mostly). Those who spent their house are not as interesting, I guess.
Check out this 60 Minutes Special on the 99ers that aried last Sunday. The interviews took place in San Jose…
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6987699n&tag=contentMain;contentAux
Oh WOOO WOOO WOOO! The boomers sure have it rough don’t they! I just broke another violin while reading that.
Them’s some big bucks.
Top 100 Real Estate Agents Worldwide, by sales volume
http://online.wsj.com/ad/top100individualvolume_2009.html
Look at #14!!!!!
What a name!
I’m in the process of creating a real estate firm that pools investor money together to buy distressed properties and rents them out for positive cashflow. It’s called “Dewey, Dickham, and Howe”
That list is loaded with high powered markets.
Montecito, Palo Alto, Beverly Hills, Palm Beach
I did a double take seeing
Bakersfield at #50 & #51 with
$64M each in sales volume
This place is a lot of ugly for $613,750.
BOO!!!!
http://www.crackthecode.us/images/SkeletonBasement.jpg
Real or Fluff to try to increase rents?
http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/10/27/irvine-co-sees-end-of-apartment-rent-cuts/86060/
I hear that CA has ~10% unemployment, 7% underemployment, 6% discouraged workers (over 2 years without working or no longer looking). Can rent go up with those underlying numbers? Only if section 8 will pay. How hard is it to get section 8 in Irvine area?
Make an offer now and select the paint colors
HURRY!!!! Don’t want to miss out on choosing those colors now!
http://www.crackthecode.us/images/lipstick.jpg
In Spain, Homes Are Taken but Debt Stays
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/world/europe/28spain.html?pagewanted=1&hp;
We Can Either Have a Rational Resolution to the Foreclosure Crisis or We Can Preserve the Capital Structure of the Banks. We Can’t Do Both … GeorgeWashington relates in ZeroHedge post.